1971 Rover 2000 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1971 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1971 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 271 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1971 Rover 2000 has manual transmission. 1971 Rover 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: