1971 Zastava 1300 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Zastava 1300 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 1300 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |
