1972 AMC Ambassador vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 1996 Zagato Bravo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Ambassador would be higher.
Because 1972 AMC Ambassador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Ambassador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Ambassador | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
Make | AMC | Zagato |
Model | Ambassador | Bravo |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |