1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2003 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 595 kg more than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2003 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Aston Martin | Volkswagen |
Model | AM Vantage | Polo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1155 kg |