1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 1981 Mazda 626 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | 626 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |