1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 646 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1800 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |