1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 (240 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1969 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2200 | W 111 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 78.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 65 L |