1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | 2200 | 200 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |