1972 Austin 2200 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 2200 | C 52 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |