1972 BMW 520 vs. 2012 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2012 Renault Scenic is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW 520 (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2012 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW 520 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2012 Renault Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Scenic (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520. 2012 Renault Scenic has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW 520 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW 520 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW 520 | 2012 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 520 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |
