1972 Citroen SM vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM. 2010 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1972 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1972 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Citroen SM | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | SM | Flex |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2668 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 262 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 336 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2995 mm |