1972 DAF 66 vs. 2003 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2003 Dodge Neon | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | 66 | Neon |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |