1972 Holden Monaro vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Holden Monaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1972 Holden Monaro. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Monaro weights approximately 145 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Monaro (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Holden Monaro | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Monaro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2834 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
