1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 526 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Saturn L | |
| Make | Mazda | Saturn |
| Model | Cosmo | L |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2999 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1468 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |
