1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 233 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1460 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |