1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-2 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |