1972 Volvo 145 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 145.
Because 1972 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Volvo 145 (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Volvo 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Volvo 145 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Volvo | Peugeot |
Model | 145 | 408 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2710 mm |