1973 Audi Asso vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Audi Asso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Audi Asso would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1973 Audi Asso. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1973 Audi Asso.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Audi Asso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Audi Asso. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Audi Asso.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Audi Asso | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Asso | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2810 mm |