1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1979 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Calais | 1979 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Calais | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1979 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |