1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,101 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1952 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1952 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1952 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | 160 | P4 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2101 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |