1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1979 Zastava 132

To start off, 1979 Zastava 132 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (163 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler 160 1979 Zastava 132
Make Chrysler Zastava
Model 160 132
Year Released 1973 1979
Engine Size 1981 cc 1754 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 142 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1115 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2560 mm