1973 Citroen SM vs. 2002 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2002 Skoda Superb is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Skoda Superb. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 2002 Skoda Superb.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Superb (310 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 2002 Skoda Superb will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Citroen SM | 2002 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | SM | Superb |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2670 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2810 mm |