1975 Audi 50 vs. 1982 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1975 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1975 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 1982 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 50 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1975 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4186 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1890 mm |