1975 Austin 1800 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin 1800 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 1800 | 9 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 38 L |