1975 Holden Torana vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,256 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1975 Holden Torana. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1975 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Holden Torana weights approximately 115 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Holden Torana. (97 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Holden Torana | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Holden | MCC |
| Model | Torana | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1256 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 1810 mm |
