1975 Mazda 818 vs. 2012 Volvo S80
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S80 weights approximately 609 kg more than 1975 Mazda 818.
Because 1975 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S80 (240 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mazda 818 | 2012 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 818 | S80 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2776 mm |
