1975 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 395 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1975 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Mercedes-Benz E | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | E | Clio |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2770 mm |
