1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1975 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Nissan Cedric (127 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1975 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Cedric | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |