1975 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 285 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | ATS |
Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2775 mm |