1975 Volvo 66 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Volvo 66 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
| Model | 66 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1910 mm |
