1976 Audi 50 vs. 2003 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Audi 50 | 2003 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Audi | Lincoln |
Model | 50 | LS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 771 cc | 3934 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1870 mm |