1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1976 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 496 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2930 mm |