1976 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,768 cc, 2008 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 45 kg more than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Because 1976 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Almera (161 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | 160 | Almera |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1768 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |
