1976 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,345 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Ka |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2345 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |