1976 Ford Falcon vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1976 Ford Falcon. (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (325 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Falcon | SS |
Year Released | 1976 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |