1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. Both 1976 Mazda Cosmo and 1978 Mazda Cosmo are equipped with a 1,769 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 93 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 2 kg more than 1976 Mazda Cosmo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 150 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Mazda Cosmo 1978 Mazda Cosmo
Make Mazda Mazda
Model Cosmo Cosmo
Year Released 1976 1978
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80.1 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 88 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 1092 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 65 L