1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Saturn L | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Saturn |
Model | Cutlass | L |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2710 mm |