1977 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1977 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | CTS |
Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 5664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 395 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |