1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2000 Skoda Octavia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 275 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160.

Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Skoda Octavia (210 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Chrysler 160 2000 Skoda Octavia
Make Chrysler Skoda
Model 160 Octavia
Year Released 1978 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3750 RPM
Torque 133 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1085 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2520 mm