1978 Monteverdi Sahara vs. 2011 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2011 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 2011 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 2011 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2011 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | 2011 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Ford |
| Model | Sahara | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3253 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 412 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4778 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2720 mm |
