1978 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 425 kg more than 1978 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Bluebird | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
