1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 1976 Triumph Stag

To start off, 1978 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 140 kg more than 1976 Triumph Stag.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Nissan Cedric 1976 Triumph Stag
Make Nissan Triumph
Model Cedric Stag
Year Released 1978 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1982 cc 2997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 234 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1350 kg 1210 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1260 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2550 mm