1978 Nissan Cedric vs. 1983 Volvo 240

To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (112 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 50 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 240 (185 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Nissan Cedric 1983 Volvo 240
Make Nissan Volvo
Model Cedric 240
Year Released 1978 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1982 cc 2316 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 112 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1350 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2660 mm