1978 Volvo 66 vs. 2011 Citroen C4
To start off, 2011 Citroen C4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C4 (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C4 (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Volvo 66 | 2011 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Volvo | Citroen |
Model | 66 | C4 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |