1979 Renault 20 vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Renault 20 weights approximately 81 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Renault 20 | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 20 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 1647 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
