1979 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 200 kg more than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser has manual transmission. 1979 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Toyota Land Cruiser | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Land Cruiser | CR-V |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2620 mm |