1980 Audi 100 vs. 1952 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1980 Audi 100 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,921 cc, 1980 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Audi 100 | 1952 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Audi | Simca |
| Model | 100 | Aronde |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1921 cc | 1221 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 41 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
