1980 Audi 200 vs. 1944 Packard 12
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,756 cc (12 cylinders), 1944 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1944 Packard 12 (173 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Audi 200. (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1944 Packard 12 should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Packard 12 weights approximately 1154 kg more than 1980 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1944 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Audi 200 | 1944 Packard 12 | |
Make | Audi | Packard |
Model | 200 | 12 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3440 mm |