1980 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1980 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 982 kg more than 1980 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Allegro. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Austin Allegro 2013 Dodge CHARGER
Make Austin Dodge
Model Allegro CHARGER
Year Released 1980 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 44 HP 288 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 74 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.7 mm 83 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 815 kg 1797 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 5077 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1482 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 3052 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]