1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 693 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Monte Carlo | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |